Lesbophobe&anti-natalist, you say?<


the same rad,who deemed me a racist..also brought down the hammer on a 2nd offense:

lesbophobe {based on Dead to Me,where i challenged social sex-obsession}

fortunately i’ve recently discovered my soul-sister,whose view on everything aligns with my own .top of the list are race, sex,+slur-slinging. she outlined it all beautifully succinctly here:


People are so very tribal, and what they like least of all are those straddling tribes (remember that Hollywoo moment in mid-90s,when bi-sexuals were the height of evil//..)

OR renouncing tribal allegiance  en toto.

..and this precisely what sexually unaligned women like me &this author do. It aint’ pretty,when feminist discourse is so heavily rooted in the ins&outs (pun intended)of genitalia dictating our lives.

& it makes fems antsy.specially young,insecure lesbian ones(as pointed out by this author)&this specific gal does seem insecure indeed.

*i’m emotionally gay. i always have been ,,like the author above. my search for female approval &deep energetic connection has run my life. i don’t even know whether my intense pull towards certain women+girls (1 produced a dream which felt  erotic, yet nothing of the kind happened in it). females i despised still felt like memorable individuals to me.i’ve trouble processing Y-carriers as my species *so that duping us into thinking they’re female doesn’t work on me (not the Ts, what Trust talked about)

i also don’t wish to reproduce mentally, but my hormones do. and ASD brains produce either hypersexuality, or asexuality in women, which is fundamentally wired to our fertility) &nothing in between,and it tapers off with age (and in my case) undoing the neuro-plasiticity.

i’ve had such thoughts myself, but here they are re-affirmed here:https://cherryblossomlife.wordpress.com/2019/10/14/fuck-ive-just-realized-why-we-need-to-know-who-the-father-is/

..in times past;whenever i ovulated, I’d scan mens’ bodies for nice parts (namely hands).it still did nothing to pull me towards them personally. they were drones as much as ever.once (when i was 26 & in peak reproductive age),i met a man who overwhelmed  me with something undefinable. i didn’t react to his photo, but when i was around him even briefly }that desire was the post powerful thing i ever felt,…’which pulled me into doing wacky ,extremely uncharacteristic things like risking my job &future commendation to sleep with him. He too was almost completely a personal drone. /

but, but

it should be noted that he was very Mestizo-Hispanic.he came from a country with a high concentration of indigenous blood in the mixed populace. and CBL mentions the dif.race part, & mixed race humans have a well-earned rep for looking attractive, or at the very least interesting. So racism doesn’t compute in women ~since genetic diversity is  very  good for our offspring. in fact, this is why racism exists in men!! to control women ~to avoid them wandering away & mating with the other tribe.pure-blood beings only exist as a product of mens/ millenia-long shielding of women from this. so in essence…

patriarchy is reproductively unhealthy. Marrying 1 male of the same tribe &producing 14 offspring with him is 14 times a genetic fail. 13 of those being the most egregious, because once doesn’t produce any siblings available to in-breeding

in fact,,i’d speculate that this is an extra reason (on top of dude-meds+poison of everything) as to why why we’re so flipping ill these days.look what happens to pure-bred dogs,esp, when the breeding stock is narrow. and what happened to european royalty.the only reason they aren’t hemophilic these days -is via infusion of non-royal blood in recent time.

what i don’t support about CBL’s stance is her not translating a search for genetic health into anti-natalism for the genetically unhealthy.there is good reason why DOwn syndrome sufferers are sterile.~because Nature is a eugenicist.


my aspie , radiated father shoulda known better than to breed & auties shouldn’t reproduce in general. This is the woefully un-PC opinion of the face of autism (Temple Grandin). i support it.my long-suffering chronically ill friend also knew better:she chose not to have the 2 kids she planned _cos she couldn’t bare to inflict her kind of pain on anybody else.

so anti-natalists (not the mysogynist kind) are not sick in the head, or evil fascists out to curtail the maternal instinct cos they’re feeling evil that day. instinctively,i think we know that the jig is up with our kind of life on this planet &under this regime.thanks to that same female intuition witchy radfems praise.

in fact, this kind of blind support for some womens’ drive to pro-create is kinda……lib-femmy.why don’t the proponents of the Anti-Mother Hate camp listen to their other intuition ,eh?isnt that like tuning into only AM radio&dismissing all FM-listeners as AM-haters?why don’t they heed the cries of ASD<HSP<introvert XXs,whom extrovert motherhood (the only 1 on  offer) is killing in body&mind!>!

after all, there ‘re other animals who practise anti-natalism . Kangaroos freeze joey embryos in lean season, rats in overcrowded cage kick males trying to mate +continue to do that after being removed into better space.our very close chimp relatives miscarry when a new team of males overtakes.in fact:human females do that too with new dick-sticker .

it’s illogical to dismiss anti-natalism as being against nature. are those kangaroo would-be-mums ….mother-haters?!can we at least commit to a freeze on our joey-production until we sort this male global mess out? ideologically>as of course women can’t help being used as child-factories when they have no say&can’t/wont help taking it out on daughters. also women do not become saints when they reproduce . if they were shit humans to start with>they don’t go through a magical personality cleanse.in fact, they ‘re likely to worsen with the inhuman suffering inflicted in them via the process.all i experience with statements such as every woman’s child is perfect to her is…



it is ,again, not practised in nature~where unviable cubs are abandoned, or whether saving them risks the mum’s life too much. this indoctrination stems to Victorian times.

like said here , don’t trust your feelings &how society milks them. for instance, i grieve my poor puppy lost to a hideous genetic disease,but that doesn’t compel me to get another one  of the same breed.in fact, it made me re-assess the whole existence of pure-bred dogs:



….so why aren’t women who have enough cerebral agency to override their fertile -sexual drive celebrated, or just simply listened to, eh???? why is mind-over-matter not  virtue and feelings reign supreme in womens’ space -to promote only sexual lesbianism; mindless pro-creation, or whatever else the feminist’s heart desires?


To go back to female-mimicking , there is 1 male who managed to so successfully.Nope, he didn’t chop off his genitals and wear lippy IRL.He was merely born so XX-like that it’s uncanny. the remarkable thing, however,is that he’s not effeminate, but naturally almost woman-like.Everything about him from facial type ..to body language..to energy…to behaviour ,,to how he hugs a child.   .and it’s not something You-KNOW-Whos can ever dream of doing with all their slicing, dicing, painting, & tantrums

This guy’s name is Jaime Camil.I’ve spent 5 season watching him on Jane the Virgin, seen 2 of his novelas & some movies& watched extensive interviews in fascination.it’s like i don’t register him as a dude despite him doing such a dudely thing as marrying, breeding a Y & splashing it all over SM as a virtue.wierder still is his choice of woman too:a thoroughly odd-looking ex-model.-with a face only a mother could love & def. not one dudes would choose as arm-candy status symbol.dude’s a great screen kisser too ,unlike the aggressive male style you see. i saw several, maybe 5 min. scenes when he did nothing but kiss+nuzzle gently&with variation.<so no dude sexual aggression observed either.

back in his native Mexico he was grilled relentlessly over his ‘metrosexuality’.they couldnt pin him down cos he’s not gay, or intersex,or trans, or limp-wristed.  GNC ppl,who are not of the LGB tribe are distrusted (tribe outliers)

so what the hell is he,i wonder?statistical outlier,or did he get bathed in estrogen in the womb or something? or is it that feminisation process that’s been continuing for several millenia,where sexual dimorphism&alpha facial structure  reduced>is he the male of the future (as in the only kind women MIGHT consider humping willingly)      >>

so weird &wonderful.and he doesn’t jump onto his co-star’s self-serving male feminist platform,but doesnt spout any direct sexism either.it’s like he’s content in his special club of 1.like he gained entrance to holistic female-ness,while being male-privileged.no wonder he’s a deliriously joyful person&projects it around him.Everyone who’s worked with him,described his presence as a “wave of love’ or something similar.















2 thoughts on “Lesbophobe&anti-natalist, you say?<

  1. ^this is why i don’t buy into bio-connection mummy Woo . a baby’s smell, or trauma-bonding or chemical connection to her does. NOT .= LOVE & willingness to burden yourself for life.that stuff is hormonal, and may not even last past baby-hood as mammals rarely nurse young for long.

    And it’s not from being un-bonded after birth either. My gestator was plenty bonded with me and still loathed my f_ing guts.it felt like she punished me for instigating that bond.

    And every birthed woman has the right to have her life back &adopt the kid out if that is best for her, or the kid. valorising bio-motherhood universally guilts&tricks women +daughters.and it makes them feel like they have no choice but drag along with lead boots on for the rest of their life & punish the offspring for ending her independent life.

    Women aren’t always tethered to life joyously. often it hurts beyond measure and we wish that we were more numb like men. so unhappy mums feel compelled to keep the product alive,but make sure to make that living a tragedy cos-misery loves company

    nowadays women feel dragged into making a big deal out of miscarriages

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s