He loved Big Brother
Remember that final chilling line from 1984? This is the protagonist’s fate after progressive, extensive torture broke his rebellious spirit after attempts to thwart the all pervasive totalitarian regime engendered by Big Brother. Substitute women for Winston and men for Big Brother. This is how men made the majority of us in developed countries ‘straight’. This wasn’t necessary in vast stretches of the rest of the world because there males just employ good old force and starvation techniques (just like they used to over here). This is all that heterosexuality amounts to. XXs have been broken like Winston to love men Big Brother style.
Within the sphere of very radical feminism, the construct of heterosexuality is my favourite subject. I’m a Millennial, so I was reared on Born This Way as a 1 size fits all being unquestioned. I only now realise WHY it was so: because it strengthened the myth of innate and unstoppable female pull towards men and the need to belong to one as a token tormentor among the majority of women (aside from those few ‘deviants’ they’ll grudgingly acknowledge)
The residents of an all-female Kenyan village were sincerely baffled by the concept of recreational
engagement with men (especially PIV for pleasure) when asked by a Western woman. This is because these sensible Kenyan womyn live in the aforementioned part of the world, where force is all men use to rope women into being with them. As a consequence, they are unfamiliar with the hetero propaganda we’re bombarded with since conception. Our grandmothers living in the pre-20s and 60s sexual revolutions were the same. It’s so obvious, isn’t? If you’re Winston & men are Big Brother + Alien pregnancy invasion in a single combo > how could you possibly relate to them as a source of personal & sexual satisfaction??? After a certain point I couldn’t even hold down male friends once it became obvious that they live in another dimension from me: I live in the one where I can’t even drop a library book in the evening safely.
Of course lesbians are bombarded with that hetero-bondage indoctrination too. Here’s the crucial difference however: they display an obvious pull towards the opposite, which fits neatly within male understanding. The rest of the female population belongs in the gray area too complex and broken by male interference (refer to Ball of Yarn) for thick male brains to comprehend. When they try – they really embarrass themselves (like Freud, Masters). Kinsey at least had a few brain cells as witnessed by the Kinsey scale (it’s a tip of the iceberg, but still puts him above the rest). Sexual orientation is a simplistic man’s concept. It amount to: the sex I’d like to stick my appendage into. It dates only to the 19th century and was a response to 1st wave feminism and the emerging visibility of homosexuality.
Bonding with males with is a learned and forced behaviour. No other mammal female employs it because mammalian males are nothing more than sperm banks and rape machines. They provide no parental investment (there’re statistically insignificant exceptions) or survival benefits for females. In fact, they actively sabotage the parental work of females by killing their young, hurting the females’ well-being and draining their resources. This is especially obvious among all primates and humans specifically.
Furthermore, throughout history and pre-history female humans have barely menstruated. They spent their lives pregnant or breast-feeding, and experienced earlier menopause and later menarche than modern women. This is a crucial fact, because female libido is highly dependant on menstrual cycle hormones, which exist to…guess what? Reproduce with or without males. Which means that desire towards males was only rarely present – if ever, on any notable scale.
And here is the meaning of life: https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/semen-mens-chemical-war-against-women-part-v-maleness-in-context-cross-species-sperm-transfer-tactics-reveals-what-maleness-is/